The EVIDENCE that the Queensland Information Commissioner states
that the SOLICITOR for the Brisbane City Council [BCC] is a LIAR.
The parasitic employees of the BCC had decided that they would gut my
yard. We need look no further than Garth Donnelly and Gaylene Vivian to find a
motive. They knew they needed a court order, but did not want to have
to argue against me as they did not have a case. They instead
decided on a process whereby they would enter my yard and steal all of
my property, break and enter my home/house and steal more of my
property, and then if really put to the test, they could just claim,
"oh sorr-rry, we must have mad a mistake because we thought the legal
opinion we gained meant that we did not have to obtain a court order."
They knew they needed court order:
I have concealed the identity of the BCC solicitor, [and the barrister
who was clearly prepared to do anything to get a quid], because
although a real dumb lowlife parasite, I do not wish to detract from
the real culprits, the BCC and ALL BCC STAFF, as that is the culture at
BCC: they think by cheating others through dishonesty and clandestine
action is "being smart", because really they are too dumb to be "smart"
in any real way.. The plan of these lowlifes, all along
was to say that they had legal opinion that said that a court order was
unnecessary. It appears this solicitor had discussions,
nothing in writing, with a barrister to do as required.
Both the BCC and the barrister believed that the legal opinion would
Profession Privilege [lpp]. In fact, the BCC claimed lpp when
I attempted to gain access to it under Freedom of Information
The important words to note here is the last sentenance in the second
paragraph which reads, "Council has obtained
legal advice that confirms that your
consent to that entry is not required and Council is authorised to do
all acts necessary to obtain entry and perform the work."
The Queensland Information Commissioner wrote me a ten page letter
dated 23 May. 2006 regarding this matter of the gravamen of the
release to me of the legal opinion. The BCC had in fact waived
privilege [lpp] albeit it unintentionally. Even BCC "lawyers" are
so dumb that they waive the "protection" they already had by lpp
without even realising they had. They were just too cocky about
how "smart" they were.
So, as an independant third party, the Queensland
Information Commissioner has stated:
"The legal advice does not state that the
applicant's consent to entry was not required."